心声 ⭐ Featured

A Response from a Harvard student to the Chinese American Community

By 美华 0 Views 26 comments
I first read Eileen’s letter a few days ago, and was—as many of its readers were—stunned by its eloquence and poignancy.

Chinese version(中文版)

My name is Kalos Chu. I am a junior at Harvard University studying English, and I’m one of the presidents of the Chinese Students Association. I first read Eileen’s letter a few days ago, and was—as many of its readers were—stunned by its eloquence and poignancy. For those of you who have not yet read it, I urge you to do so before continuing.

As someone whose Chinese is far from strong enough to read a newspaper, much less talk about complex social issues like “systemic racism” and “the model minority myth,” I’ve often found it difficult to discuss these issues with my parents. Eileen’s letter and its Chinese translation were, I thought, the solution. Finally, someone had written down the thoughts I’d been unable to express cogently and packaged it in a way that both my parents and I could understand! I sent the link to my parents and waited for the letter to magically change their minds and turn them into social justice warriors. Alas, I was wrong. They sent back this letter (one that I also encourage you to read before continuing)—a response to Eileen’s letter from a Chinese American named Yitao. And upon reading it, I, too, felt the urge to contribute to this conversation.

So yes, my letter is a response to yours, Eileen—a perspective that I would like to respectfully add to your powerful words. But it is also a response to Yitao, a response to my parents, and a response to the Chinese American community at large. Four essays for the price of one—quite a deal, if you ask me.

First, to you, Eileen. My response is, in short, thank you. You did the heavy lifting—the research, the arguments, the tracing of a path through our shared history—all with the care and maturity of, well, an English major (they say we’re a dying species, but if that’s true, we’re going out strong!). I leave out, here, the arguments that you make, because I do not want to repeat and mince your words—but know that I stand by them fully.

Now, to you, Yitao. Let me say first that I agree with you: I think Chinese Americans are among the most courageous and compassionate and hard-working people in this country. I could explain why, but I’m not sure I need to. I’m sure that everyone reading this article has Chinese Americans in their lives who are the epitome of what you describe, who have “overcome difficulties unimaginable to you to come to the US.” For me, those people are my parents, the hardest-working people I know. Their stories of success are our sources of pride, not embarrassment, contrary to what you accuse us of. I don’t think I, Eileen, or any other Chinese American would ever argue otherwise.

I also agree with the importance of the idiom “天下兴亡,匹夫有责" (the rise and fall of a nation is the responsibility of every ordinary person), and, indeed, the actions of Chinese Americans in response to COVID-19 are a heartwarming reaffirmation of this ideal. But doesn’t the rise and fall of a nation include, too, its conditions of racial equality? Shouldn’t the ordinary person, then, be committed to helping America heal its social diseases as well? You make a powerful final point, that “we are on the side of equality, justice, and a greater America,” but doesn’t being on that side mean helping all Americans, especially Black Americans?

To this, I imagine you would rebut with the importance of self-reliance. You say that “if there is a way for Chinese Americans to make their unique contribution to social justice, sharing our cultural values is probably the one,” that Black Americans should, “through better education and hard work and entrepreneurship,” lift themselves up as we Chinese Americans did. Well, here is where I must respectfully disagree.

As hard-working as Chinese Americans are, I think it would be presumptuous to claim hard work as an exclusively Chinese cultural value. I think it would be narrow-minded to think that Black people don’t want to send their kids to good schools, don’t want good lives for their families, or don’t want to be self-reliant as well.

The problem is that “self-reliance” is not an equally attainable goal for Chinese Americans and Black Americans. Yes, the immigrant experience is difficult. My parents had to overcome numerous economic, social, and cultural barriers in their lifetimes, and there is no way I could ever understand the depth of hardship they endured to allow me to be where I am today. But they did not have to overcome these barriers in addition to 400 years of oppression, discrimination, and slavery; as atrocious as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, Sinophobia, and the discrimination that Chinese Americans have faced are—they do not compare to the Black American experience. Our ancestors were not brought to this country in chains. Our oppression was not embedded in the U.S. Constitution. Self-reliance is, indeed, a noble ideal to aspire to, but one that is made harder by centuries of anti-Black sentiment and structures.

You worked hard to get where you are; we know, and we are grateful. But for many people—Black people, especially—that’s often not enough.

And even for us, self-reliance isn’t always enough! Yitao, you end your letter with an ask: “Don’t tell [your parents] we owe our freedom and rights to others. We don’t, we earned them.” Having read Eileen’s essay, I’m not sure this is correct. We earned them, yes, but only with the help of Black Americans. The “self-reliance” that’s so often hailed as a panacea for systemic racism is the essence of the model minority myth, an excuse used by people in power to shirk their responsibilities to help those who need it—a fact that I will continue to tell my parents.

And speaking of my parents, this next part is addressed to you, 妈妈爸爸. I love you. Duh. I love you for making the best dumplings in the world, for helping me preserve my connection to Chinese culture, and for pushing me to be the best version of myself I can be. And it is because I love you that I’m writing this letter.

The danger of systemic racism and subconscious bias is that it’s exactly that—subconscious. It’s an invisible affliction, a disease that compromises the compassion that we, as Chinese Americans, so value in ourselves. And because I care so much about you, I do not want you to fall victim to that affliction. Sure, sometimes its symptoms manifest in the form of overtly racist remarks and actions, hate crimes or police brutality. I’m not saying you would do any of those things. I’m not saying you’re racist. No one is saying that. What I am saying, what Eileen is saying, and what our generation of Chinese Americans is saying is that you’re being silent—which is just as much of a symptom of racism. We’re saying that your decision to not speak out, to condemn the protests, to deem this as “none of our business,” is still bad.

It’s a symptom because it accepts privilege without question, because it betrays the Black Americans who fought alongside us for our rights, because it is selfish and dishonorable—all of the things you taught me not to be. You cite Confucian values, so I will do the same: “己欲立而立人,己欲达而达人,” or, “A man of humanity is one who, in seeking to establish himself, finds a foothold for others and who, in desiring attaining himself, helps others to attain.” However you choose to cure this symptom of silence—be it donating, sharing posts, voting, reading, signing petitions, protesting—I implore you not to ignore it, because it breaks our hearts every time you do.

And to the Chinese American community at large, I present a bit of a digression. As I’m sure you know, Harvard’s been embroiled in a lawsuit regarding its affirmative action policies, a discussion that, as a Chinese American Harvard student, I’ve found myself in the center of. I think it’s also relevant to mention that Chinese Americans support affirmative action far less than other Asian Americans (40% of Chinese are in favor, compared to 73% for other Asian groups), and that the group suing Harvard (Students for Fair Admissions), is composed primarily of Chinese Americans. Clearly, silence is not our only symptom.

I, too, am not well-versed in Asian American poetry (more of a prose guy, myself), but I have my own quote to end on, one from U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, who recently ruled on the case in federal court:

"The students who are admitted to Harvard and choose to attend will live and learn surrounded by all sorts of people, with all sorts of experiences, beliefs and talents. They will have the opportunity to know and understand one another beyond race, as whole individuals with unique histories and experiences. It is this, at Harvard and elsewhere that will move us, one day, to the point where we see that race is a fact, but not the defining fact and not the fact that tells us what is important, but we are not there yet. Until we are, race conscious admissions programs that survive strict scrutiny will have an important place in society and help ensure that colleges and universities can offer a diverse atmosphere that fosters learning, improves scholarship, and encourages mutual respect and understanding."

“We are not there yet,” she says.

And if we, as Chinese Americans, fail to stand together with Black Americans and other disadvantaged minorities—we never will be.

With love,

Kalos Chu
Harvard University, Class of 2022
President, Harvard-Radcliffe Chinese Students Association

Chinese version(中文版)

P.S. If you are interested in helping, receiving updates on ways to get involved, and pledging to address anti-Blackness in our Asian American communities, please fill out the following form.

Comments 26

Join the conversation

Please log in to leave a comment

V

V

“What I am saying, what Eileen is saying, and what our generation of Chinese Americans is saying is that you’re being silent—which is just as much of a symptom of racism.” So the logic is that we love you and therefore please think like us and act like us? And if you don’t, you are condemned as a symptom of racism. Never mind the issues of racism and economic inequality are such complicated matters that everyone should be invited to the table to discuss - in this logic, the world is only binary and if you are not one of us then you must be one of “them” and a racist. Everyone is entitled to his or her opinions and it’s great to see this discussion going on in the community. But please don’t make the narrative to be “1st generation parents that don’t understand American history” vs “2nd generation ivy-educated who, out of their love to their parents, want to redeem them from their ignorance and moral depravity”. Like all other complicated social matters, there is a spectrum of opinions on these issues, not just two sides, within any community including Asian communities and black communities. Candace Owns for example apparently doesn’t agree with this article - does that make her racist against herself? Btw, there are also a lot of “your generation of Chinese Americans”’ who don’t agree with this article. So it is perhaps at least overconfident, if not presumptuous, for someone to assume he or she represents an entire generation.
S

ssu

“You worked hard to get where you are; we know, and we are grateful. But for many people—Black people, especially—that’s often not enough.” Can you list fact why “hard working” is not enough for an African American to be successful?
P

Park Zhang

Honestly I don’t like to be pushed around that I have to pick a stand. BLM or not? Keel down or not? Speak or not? Trump or not? We all want to be in an inclusive world, that inclusiveness includes people who wants to be silent. We need to learn to listen, understand, empathy, less point a finger at each other. Do you understand why people are silent? Are they consistently silent over any matter? Do each race have to have the proportion to be for, silent, and against? Did you reach out to the less fortunate Chinese Americans?
N

Nona

Kalos, you come across to be well-meaning but also highly hypocritical, sheltered, out of touch, and in some ways, incredibly offensive and racist. Per table 14 of the Bureau of Justice Statistics Crime Report (https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf), you see that blacks overwhelmingly and violently assault asians. 27.5% of violent assaults against Asians are committed by blacks, highest of any racial group. Meanwhile, only <0.1% of violent attacks on blacks are committed by Asians. It's well documented of blacks assaulting and hate crime-ing Asians.... See this SF article in 2010: https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/nevius/article/Dirty-secret-of-black-on-Asian-violence-is-out-3265760.php In fact in this one Philly school in 2010, asians were so horrifically hate crimed by blacks that the students had to take a stand to defend themselves because anti-racist elitists such as yourself refused to do so, since it would not earn you brownie points in the media: https://www.cnn.com/2010/LIVING/10/22/philly.school.asian.american.attacks/index.html If you actually read coronavirus-related asian attack reports in the past few months, it's almost entirely blacks. We can support police reform and be against senseless violence against citizens of all races (blacks, asians, whites, hispanics, and so on), but do not try to guilt trip anyone when Asians are overwhelmingly hate crimed by one particular racial group.
B

B. Ma

I don't see it like that. No is blaming or condemning anyone here. The letters from these students have been about love, compassion and understanding. People of all races are guilty of unconscious and internalized racial bias of some kind. It's how we conduct ourselves that shows how we truly are. Candace Owens is a self-serving propagandist and mentioning her means that you have not really understood the message in Huang and Chu's letters. As people of colour, silence in the fight against racism is not overt racism, but it IS a symptom of racism. Feelings of defensiveness and denial is absolutely normal, but I think in the path towards understanding the struggle of all marginalized people is painful and difficult because it involves looking at hard truths within ourselves. You don't need to be an Ivy-educated student to know that. These students are simply imploring their parents to open their hearts and minds.
H

hanrry yule

Is this some kind of radical attack to anyone who don't agree with your whatever opinion, even just want to keep silent? Any reason you feel confident to make good/bad decision for others? "The costs of an identity ideology include not only the advancement that is forfeited, but also the needless disadvantages of letting people who represent the lowest common denominator of a group have a disproportionate influence on the fate of the group as a whole". -- Thomas Sowell.
J

Julie

"400 years of oppression, discrimination, and slavery", i am not English major, but to me, this sentence is wrong. Are you implying Black community are still in Slavery? 400 years, that means from 1600s to 2000s. Have you done your math? When did President Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery? Go check your history book.
C

Claire

V, Kalos’ argument is that it is wrong to be silent in the face of racism and injustice. If you disagree, please explain why, instead of being offended that he is trying to explain his perspective. Is it bad for people to write opinion pieces in newspapers because they want the readers to “think like them”? Is it bad for lawyers to argue in court because they want the the jury to “think like them”? “everyone should be invited to the table to discuss” This is true. No one is stopping you from discussing anything. Eileen and Kalos wrote these articles because they want to have a discussion. “in this logic, the world is only binary and if you are not one of us then you must be one of “them” and a racist.” I am not sure where you got this idea. Kalos explicitly says that he is “not saying you’re racist.” If you think that the article is generalizing too much about the views of different generations, that is understandable. However, that is a separate issue from his main message - that we should help fight racism against African-Americans.
J

Jack

I applaud your effort to continue to find yourself. If history is any guide, here is a story. During China’s cultural revolution, everyone has to pick a side, are you are with the Party or against the Party? we know what happened to the latter. In today’s China, just look up the word 初心, who used it first and how many times it is repeated by the whole country, because if you don’t, you won’t be there for very long. When you have no choice, you either lie or die. Hu Shih’s son wrote an open letter to denounce his father after some six months’ intense brainwashing in the Chinese Revolution University in the early 1950s, he was more “progressive” than you ever wanted to be. He survived that round of “thought reform”, but he ultimately committed suicide years later in another round of “thought reform”. In a totalitarian country, everyone has to pick a side and silence is not an option. I ask you to read Orwell’s 1984 one more time.
M

Mary Legault

What really makes me upset is the arrogant attitude of Eileen Huang and those Ivy-League educated people that either you are with me or you are against me. BTW, George Floyd was convicted of robbing a pregnant woman at gun point . How many of you guys are aware of it or just don't give a damn ? I heard that Chinese student at Yale are pressured to donate to the various funds supporting the Black Lives Matter movement . This just sound like Cultural Revolution in China in 1967,

Related Posts

Community

纽约为什么需要细分了的亚太裔数据?

在过去的十三年中,纽约市亚太裔服务组织只收到了纽约市用于帮助不同族裔总资金的3.1%。而亚太裔占纽约市人口的14.3%。原因在哪里?

十一月 28, 2021
Xin Sheng

种族批判理论不是反亚裔的!美国第一位亚裔女性法学终身教授的一封信

上世纪70年代兴起的种族批判理论(CRT),在今天美国的种族矛盾激化和仇恨亚裔犯罪事件频发的背景下,再次引发激烈的讨论和争议,在华人社区也不例外。CRT理论倡导者之一松田麻里(Mari Matsuda),是美国历史上第一位亚裔女性终身法学教授。不久前,松田教授以书信的形式发表了声明,从历史角度陈述亚裔在种族批判理论中的中心角色,对2021年3月《新闻周刊》一篇题为“亚裔美国人成为反对种族批判...

六月 25, 2021